dabbler in stocks

We all benefit from how the web allows us to dabble:to show our photos, join a creative writing community, or diagnose the scaly skin situation. And the lines between amateur and professional are increasingly blurry (the Pro-Am phenomenon).

Joining Twitter, I was boggled by how many bloggers were writing about work psychology… but then why not? Qualifications guarantee no monopoly of a subject, and are often less attractive than enthusiasm. Now we can dabble as our own lawyers , our own university teachers and our own web designers . And there’s no doubt that some dabblers possess incredible selling skills, whether they can deliver the goods or not.

Rebutting Dabble Attack

Some signs then that your career may be under dabble threat include:

  • you know yourself areas of your work could be computerized – but the geeks haven’t clocked it yet
  • you spend more time justifying your impact and value than you do on job delivery
  • you Google odd combinations of your specialization with its adjacent fields and are shocked to find people with unexpected job titles doing your work

So to insure yourself against dabble attack you could:

  • take up futurology, but think like Warren Buffet. Don’t pile into trends – instead orient what you do to them
  • produce vivid evidence of what you do, cross-platform, and on and offline. Remember the Steve Jobs dictum: real artists ship.
  • be as creative as you can about what you are supposed to know about – dig deep to come up with new discoveries, link to unusual specializations. People always need expertise, but the depth and whereabouts of the need may shift. Keep thinking ‘Who can benefit best from what I know and where are they?’

Definitions of dabbling tend to include ‘a lack of serious intent’. Which doesn’t mean that our own dabbling can’t become something more significant. James Dyson reckons you can become expert in anything in 6 months, given sufficient application. What you love and tinker with could become a whole new direction – and one that offsets threats in today’s churning workplace.

Advertisements

Join the conversation! 2 Comments

  1. ‘Dabbler’, I like it! The web does lend itself to a bit of dabbling. I liked the point about odd combinations with adjacent fields. It seems to me that with the whole world online, having a unique combination of qualifications and skills could become more important than ever.

    Reply
    • And I like your blog, combining psychology and creativity, very tighly focussed and most interesting. By the way, re your latest post, don’t know if you know Dorothy Rowe’s work but she reckons introverts are morning people (not overly stimulated so soon in the day) and extroverts are evening people ( buzzing on the stimulation the day has brought)… it’s an idea?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Category

Creativity & Innovation

Tags